GPU & Cluster Benchmarking
MLPerf-style training and inference benchmarks across NVIDIA, AMD and cloud instances โ plus fabric stress tests (NCCL all-reduce, congestion behavior) that reveal what single-node numbers hide.
Vendor slides say one thing. Your workload says another. We measure what your models and hardware actually do โ throughput, latency, quality and cost โ so every AI decision you make is backed by data instead of marketing.
MLPerf-style training and inference benchmarks across NVIDIA, AMD and cloud instances โ plus fabric stress tests (NCCL all-reduce, congestion behavior) that reveal what single-node numbers hide.
Tokens per second, time-to-first-token, latency under concurrency and cost per million tokens โ across serving stacks (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, Triton) and quantization levels.
Task-specific eval suites for your use case โ accuracy, hallucination rates, safety behavior โ comparing commercial APIs against open-weight models on your real data.
Batching, quantization, KV-cache tuning, model routing and right-sizing. Typical engagements find 40โ70% cost reduction on production inference workloads.
About to commit to a GPU order or a multi-year cloud deal? We benchmark your candidate configurations on rented capacity first, so the PO reflects evidence.
Workload modeling that translates business growth into GPU counts, power and budget โ so you buy the right amount of compute at the right time.
Every benchmarking engagement produces a reproducible methodology, raw data, and an executive summary that ranks your options by performance-per-dollar for your specific workload. Where we find optimization headroom, we quantify it and โ if you want โ implement it.
If you're spending five figures a month or more on AI compute, a benchmarking engagement almost always pays for itself. Let's find out.
Talk to a Performance Engineer